How to Write an Argument of Evaluation Essay TopicEvaluating the argument of evaluation essay topics can be quite tricky. One has to keep in mind that it is an argument in a story, as in a situation where both parties are going to use it as a justification for their own opinion, and they will try to convince each other that the other side is wrong. To tell the truth, as many students argue, arguments are crucial in the process of educational attainment.
Although students and teachers are not the same people, they can easily distinguish what a student does or fails to do. Unfortunately, this is a little harder to define for teachers. What most teachers probably agree on is that they do not evaluate students based on grades, achievement, or test scores. Instead, their job is to evaluate a student's ability to understand things, work well with others, and grasp complex concepts.
As a result, there are different kinds of arguments that are actually quite simple to understand, such as 'academic freedom', 'common ground', 'connect the dots', 'science is good', 'the study of human nature' - but there are also many other issues that can cause conflicts between students and teachers. When these things are involved, teachers need to be able to make their decisions on whether to proceed or to be more careful about evaluating students. This article will briefly look at the different kinds of arguments and which one is most likely to be necessary.
When students argue that the school board should grant them academic freedom, it is important to ask whether this freedom actually allows them to study anything they want. This freedom can be used to study all subjects, or only select a specific topic of interest to them. There are two ways that such freedom is usually granted. The first is by parents, and the second is when the student presents a case that his or her topic of interest is important for his or her future in a particular field.
Students can debate about the specifics of their freedom, but they mostly agree that freedom comes in the form of the right to express their opinions freely in class, without being censored by teachers. It is also commonly granted by teachers to support their own personal views and beliefs. It is easy to see why students have the freedom to pursue their interests, especially in the current generation, where many students seem to feel that their best interests are best served by pursuing their individual careers. This concept of academic freedom, of course, does not mean that teachers should reward students for their personal choices.
In contrast, if a student is allowed to pursue their academic interest without any interference from the teacher, there is an argument for allowing the student to express his or her ideas freely. That student may then use that freedom to pursue other interests, including wanting to be a doctor, or a famous scientist, or some other form of work that would help earn a high salary. With this type of freedom, the teacher might think that the student is putting the importance of education ahead of the interest, even though his or her goal is to make a fortune. This kind of freedom may be similar to the academic freedom that is given to other students during their first year in college. However, with academic freedom, the student would still be required to present a strong academic performance to qualify for a scholarship.
On the other hand, students that want to argue that the study of human nature is important for them to develop can also make a case for the need for a topic that is so important that students should be allowed to pursue it, even if there is already a common ground. The typical argument of evaluation for such a topic could include: 'I want to know more about humans because I want to better understand myself. Through this, I can better understand the way my fellow human beings see the world.' These kinds of arguments are usually well supported by facts and theories.